by Adrian Hashu on JULY 7, 2012

 “Poate ne gândim la un sistem în care, pentru cei care nu trăiesc pe teritoriul României, condiţionăm dreptul la vot de plata a cel puţin unui impozit în ţară, că e teren, că e casă, că e alt tip de venit impozitat”

Crin Antonescu – interviu pentru „Gazeta Românească”, publicaţie a romanilor din Italia, 25 martie 2011

Citatul de mai sus este extraordinar de relevant pentru gândirea de comunist a „liberalului” Crin Antonescu, ajuns preşedinte interimar al României cu voturile a circa 9.000 de alegători, plus voturile a 256 de parlamentari – securişti şi turnători la Securitate, infractori de drept comun, traseişti politici, îmbogăţiţi din afaceri cu statul, plagiatori, activişti comunişti, si maimuţoi sfidători, care refuză să părăsească Parlamentul, deşi au fost declaraţi incompatibili de cea mai înaltă instanţă judecătorească a României.

De ce îi urăşte Antonescu pe milioanele de români din diaspora? Simplu: pentru că aceştia nu se lasă manipulaţi, pentru că au acces neîngrădit la informaţie, pentru că ştiu să facă diferenţa dintre liberali şi comunişti, pentru că nu se uită la gâzi, ciutaci, ciuvici şi alte soiuri de gurnalişti şi ziarizde ale lui Felix turnătorul. Pentru că aceşti oameni nu votează comuniştii, oricât de atent s-ar vopsi. Deci nu-l vor vota niciodată.

Tipic pentru un „democrat”, prima idee a lui Antonescu este să îi i împiedice pe românii din diaspora să voteze. Nu contează ce spune Constituţia, care garantează dreptul de vot pentru orice cetăţean român, Crin Antonescu cere o formă de discriminare între românii „buni”, cei suficient de stupizi încât să se lase păcăliţi ca să voteze USL, şi românii „răi”, care votează cu Traian Băsescu, cu o justiţie independentă, cu statul de drept.

Românii „răi” din străinătate trebuie să plătească impozite în România ca să aibă dreptul de a vota, spune Crin. Dar cele între 5 şi 7 miliarde de euro pe care românii din străinătate le-au trimis anual în ţară, în ultimii 10-12 ani, ce sunt, bou comunist cu pretenţii de liberal? Şi dacă tot impunem o astfel de barieră, de ce să fie numai pentru românii din străinătate? De ce să nu cenzurăm dreptul la vot şi pentru milioanele de asistaţi social, pensionari de lux sau de boli închipuite, revoluţionari făcuţi la apelul bocancilor sau evazionişti, care sunt nucleul dur al USL şi cei care îl votează pe Crin Antonescu? Nici ei nu plătesc impozite dar, spre deosebire de românii din diaspora, nici nu produc bani pentru România. Dimpotrivă, consumă miliardele de euro luate de stat cu japca de la puţinii oameni care mai muncesc în ţara asta sau afară şi împărţite cu generozitate de socialişti susţinătorilor lor puturoşi.

Am dat un exemplu a ce înseamnă gândirea lui Antonescu, a lui Ponta şi a celor care îi ţin în leasă pe cei doi maimuţoi din fruntea USL. Despre cel de al treilea, ala micu’ de la PC, nu are rost să vorbim, nu merită pixelii care i-ar ocupa numele său. E vorba de oameni pentru care „legalitate”, „stat de drept”, „democraţie”, „justiţie” sunt cuvinte goale, lipsite de sens, bune cel mult să fie folosite în discursuri adresate „fraierilor” din Uniunea Europeană sau Statele Unite.

Şi Antonescu, şi Ponta sunt croiţi după chipul şi asemănarea stăpânilor lor: jegul cu aparenţă umană, scârba care şi-a turnat familia la Securitate, jefuitorul îmbogăţit prin tâlhărirea României, Dan Felix Voiculescu şi fostul aparatcik comunist, criminalul Ion Ilici Iliescu. Stăpâni sau slugi, dresori sau maimuţe, cei care conduc USL pe faţă sau din umbră nu cred în democraţie. Aşa cum au încercat în perioada 2000 – 2004 şi cum încearcă acum, ei vor puterea absolută. Ei vor să controleze tot: preşedinţia, guvernul, parlamentul, justiţia, presa. Vor să controleze cum muncim, cum trăim, ce şi cât mâncăm şi, mai ales, ce şi cum gândim.

Au construit un aparat uriaş de minciună şi dezinformare. Televiziuni, ziare, radiouri, site-uri pe Internet, bloggeri şi „oameni de bine”, sunt tot atâtea trompete pentru o propagandă imundă, menită să murdărească tot ce le stă împotrivă şi să îi îndobitocească pe cei care o ascultă. Din păcate, au reuşit să păcălească milioane de români. Alte milioane sunt electoratul captiv al USL, cei de care vorbeam mai sus: asistaţi social, pensionari de lux sau cu acte false, evazionişti şi revoluţionari, infractori care au nevoie de protecţie politică. Pe toţi aceştia trebuie să-i învingem.

Eu cred că suspendarea lui Băsescu ne dă o şansă nesperată. Pentru că putem să demonstrăm că nu vrem hoţi, plagiatori, chiulangii notorii, turnători, nomenclaturişti şi alte asemenea categorii de jeguri umane. Pentru că putem să demonstrăm că ne dorim stat de drept, ne dorim democraţie reală, europeană, şi, mai ales, ne dorim o justiţie care să-i trimită pe toţi infractorii, indiferent de culoarea politică, alături de Adrian Năstase şi de Vântu, în puşcărie. Tot ce trebuie să facem este să credem în noi, în forţa noastră, în drepturile noastre şi în unitate. Şi putem să-i trimitem pe cei care jubilează astăzi, pe cei care cred că pot întoarce România la totalitarism, acolo unde le este locul: la coşul de gunoi al istoriei. După un stagiu cât mai lung în purgatoriu – în puşcăriile primitoare ale patriei.

http://politicstand.ro/discriminatorul-crin-discriminatorul/

By Todd Starnes on July 6, 2012

A Phoenix man has been sentenced to 60 days in jail after he refused to stop hosting Bible studies in the privacy of his home – in violation of the city’s building code laws.

However, the Phoenix city prosecutor’s office said the violations have nothing to do with religious freedom — and everything to do with public safety.

“It came down to zoning and proper permitting,” said Vicki Hill, the chief assistant city prosecutor. “Any time you are holding a gathering of people continuously as he does — we have concerns about people being able to exit the facility properly in case there is a fire — and that’s really all this comes down to.”

According to court documents provided to Fox News Radio, Michael Salman was found guilty in the City of Phoenix Court of 67 code violations. He was sentenced to 60 days in jail along with three years probation and a $12,180 fine. He could be jailed as early as next week unless the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals grants an emergency injunction.

“They’re cracking down on religious activities and religious use,” Salman told Fox News Radio. “They’re attacking what I as a Christian do in the privacy of my home.”

“If I had people coming to my home on a regular basis for poker night or Monday Night Football, it would be permitted,” he said. “But when someone says to us we are not allowed to gather because of religious purposes – that is when you have discrimination.”

However, the Arizona courts consistently ruled against Salman – ultimately declaring that he was engaged in church activities and that the city did not violate his constitutional rights to religious freedom.

The long-running feud between Salman and the City of Phoenix culminated in the summer of 2009 when nearly a dozen police along with city inspectors raided their home. Armed with a search warrant, police confined the Salman family to the living room as they combed the property looking for violations.

Salman is the owner of Mighty Mike’s Burgers — and he is also an ordained pastor.  He and his wife have been hosting Bible studies on their 4.6 acre property since 2005. The gatherings were originally attended by as many as 15 people.

Hill said the city became aware of the meetings after neighbors apparently complained about traffic congestion.

In 2007 they received a letter from the city informing them that the Bible studies were not permitted in their living room because it was in violation of the construction code.

A few months later, members of the Phoenix Fire Dept. broke up the family’s Good Friday fellowship. As many as 20 people were in their backyard eating a meal when firefighters threatened to call the police – unless their guests left the premises.

“Immediately after that, we decided to contact an attorney,” Salman told Fox News Radio. “The city emphasized that bible studies or church-related activities are not permitted on residences because you have non-family members coming to the home and such use is considered church use.”

In the summer of 2008 firefighters once again broke up a gathering – and Salman finally reached his breaking point. He ordered the firefighters to leave his property.

“We told them they had no right,” he said. “They had been harassing us since February. This is our home. We are a private gathering. This is Christians gathering on my private property.”

The city ignored the Salmans until 2009 – when they built a 2,000 square foot building in their backyard. Salman said he applied for and was granted the proper building permits. He also said the building has passed a city inspection.

“At that point we took our Bible study from our living room – and we moved it into that building,” he said. “We started worshipping in that building every weekend.”

However, Hill said Salman has “mischaracterized the facts” of the permit. She said he was given a permit to convert a garage into a game room.

“Any other occupancy or use – business, commercial, assembly, church, etc, is expressly prohibited pursuant to the city of Phoenix building code and ordinances,” she told Fox News Radio.

On June 11, 2009, the Phoenix Police Dept. showed up with a search warrant. When they had completed the search, Salman was charged with 67 code violations.

He was charged with not having emergency exit signs over the doors. He was charged with not having handicap parking spaces and not having handicap ramps.

“Imagine everything that a public building would have or a commercial building would have,” he said. “Anything we didn’t have was a violation.”

The largest source of contention has been whether or not Salman is running a church. He insists it is not.

But his building certainly resembles a church. It has chairs for as many as 40 people. There is a pulpit. There’s a sign out front – along with a cross.

“Just because visitors come to my home three times a week and we discuss the Bible – if that’s their definition of a church then so be it,” he said.

“At what point does the government have the right to state that you cannot have family and friends over at your home three times a week?” he asked. “People have a right to gather on their property as long as parking is available, as long as they aren’t parking in the street, as long as they aren’t violating noise ordinances.”

Hill said the facts are clear.

“He built a structure that he said wasn’t a church — that is in fact — a church,” she said. “It’s a church.”

And the courts agreed — noting in a Jan. 4, 2010 ruling: “The state is not saying the Salmans can’t run a church or have worship services at the location. But the state is saying that if they do so, they must do it properly and in accord with fire and zoning codes.”

Salman’s attorney has filed an appeal with the federal court – and unless they intervene – Salman will start serving his sentence on July 9.

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/man-facing-jail-for-hosting-home-bible-study.html

Where the abortion is recommended in the following four alternatives?

1). A preacher and his wife are extremely poor. They already have 14 children. Now, she is pregnant again. Considering their poverty and the excessive world population, would you consider recommending she get an abortion? 

2). The father is sick with a cold, the mother has tuberculosis. They have 4 children. One is blind, another is dead, the 3rd one is deaf, and the 4th one had tuberculosis. Now she is pregnant again. Given the extreme situation, would you recommend an abortion? 

3). A white man raped a 13 year old black girl and she got pregnant. If you were her parents, would you consider recommending abortion? 

4). A teenage girl is pregnant. She’s not married. Her fiance is not the father of the baby, and he’s very upset. Would you consider abortion?

If you recommended an abortion in any of the alternatives, you……just kill:

1). JOHN WESLEY, one of the greatest evangelist in the 19th century. Favorites quotes by Wesley: “Do all the good you can, By all the means you can, In all the ways you can, In all the places you can, To all the people you can, As long as ever you can.”…..“Catch on fire with enthusiasm and people will come for miles to watch you burn.”…..”Once in seven years I burn all my sermons; for it is a shame if I cannot write better sermons now than I did seven years ago.”

2). LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN

3). ETHEL WATERS, the great black Gospel singer

4). JESUS CHRIST, the Savior of all who call on Him, and God in flesh. “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

by Mr. Charrington on May 26, 2011

On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.

This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”. It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.

In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.

Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about  to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself.

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the 

FDA in 2004.

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid… 
A class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Going back to what we just looked at, the creation of the national medical device registry in section 2521,

page 1002 line 5:

“In developing the registry, the secretary shall…”
And the law continues on with a laundry list of items that the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In this laundry list of items to do, Line 17, subparagraph B: “validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A)”
Going back to subparagraph A [right above subparagraph B], it says: “including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;”
Don’t be confused by the intentional obfuscation and skillful wording, This law first creates the national device registry and then immediately list all the task the secretary of health and human services will have do in the process of creating this registry.
The very first two items in the list mandates that the secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items listed in paragraph 1 which is:
‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable.”
Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly and uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and class II implantable devices.

Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II implantable device!

Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B subsection ii on still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic medical records. It reads: “link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”. Information in the registry is, as we know from subparagraph A, the name of the device. So what is the data obtained under clause i? Back up a few lines to clause i
It reads: 

“obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”. Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B? That stated purpose is “for linking such data” and the such data is electronic medical records.

What we already have already seen in just the creation of this registry, is the device that will serve as the link, which is an RFID microchip that is categorized as a Class II implantable device, as well as what it will be the link for which is your electronic medical records.

In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point, still in the laundry list of things to do a few more lines down on the next page, page 1005

“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”

Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.

“The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.”

Now on Page 503, section E Lines 13-17 and I quote: “encourage, as appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts”. Let me say that again, medical device surveillance efforts!

Now lets look at section 163 of HR3200, which gives the government a direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in conjunction with an implanted chip.

Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims

What does this mean? It means that the government will give everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip is your Health Identification Number. When you visit a medical provider, the medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office. The medical providers will be paid in real time. The portion that you owe will be deducted from your bank account, in real time, according to HR 3200.

Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”. Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen, deeper in the law [Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000] what this “may” utilize is clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable”.
We can only speculate at this point why the law is set up this way. Most likely this section was written to account for the gap in time from when the process of chipping begins to when everyone has received a chip. A means of starting with a card for the sake of expedience while the process of chipping citizenry plays out. One thing is certain, the law mandates that within 3 years we will all have a chip under our skin that will serve this purpose.
Evidence of this logic is found in the deadline set for the start of the registry on page 1006.
“EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.”

Also on page 259, this law requires the use of Electronic medical records system in all hospitals by 2012 which will leave a gap of at least a year before the class II implantable device is required.

Republican Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, states on his website:
Click here to open this page 

“Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as…….. He quotes that part of the law and then goes on to say: “In “real world speak”, according to this report, this new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first Nation in the World to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification microchip for the purpose of controlling who is, or isn’t, allowed medical care in their country”.

That is from a currently serving member of congress. Cutting through all the political ease, the bottom line is that eventually if you want to participate in a government healthcare plan you will have to have this chip implanted in you. This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law guarantees that all private healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system.
See above webcast for video

When I have a number of different pieces of data, I like to lay it all out in bit size pieces so the picture becomes clearer so I’m going to lay out the data and cut through the political circular logic and legal ease:

2004:

Class II implantable devices receive FDA approval and verachip VeriMed electronic health records system also received approval from the FDA.

2009:

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act authorized $23 billion in stimulus funds for health care information technology. In conjunction with that, VeriChip re-launches VeriMed electronic health records system which is a system that is made up of implantable RFID microchips, handheld scanners for emergency room personnel to read these chips, and online electronic personal health records.

2010:

HR3200 was passed by the House and signed into law by the president
Now looking at the new law, Page 259 Electronic Medical Records system will be required for all healthcare providers by 2012.

Pages 1001-1002:
A national medical device registry is created and populated with devices. Chiefly noted among them, a Class II medical device that is implantable.

Pages 1002-1004:
Mandates the use of class II implantable devices to serve as the link between you and your electronic medical records.

Page 1005:
The secretary of human services will establish the procedures for the linking of the Class II implantable device and electronic medical records.

Page 1007:
Secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all items required in the creation of the registry as well as the power to dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.

Page 503:
Medical device surveillance is authorized.

Page 58:

The link to your electronic medical records which is the Class II implantable device will also be linked to your bank account.

Page 1006:

Without regard to whether or not final regulations are in place, you will be required to get a Class II implantable device linked to your medical records and bank account in order to participate in the government healthcare plan.

Pages 155-158:

It is mandated that you have health insurance or you will pay $100.00 dollars per day that you are not covered.

Page 159:

The IRS will enforce healthcare enrollment and fines for not caring health insurance.

Lastly:

This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law, guarantees that all privet healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system.

This new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first nation in the world to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification microchip. In theory, the intent to streamline healthcare and to eliminate fraud via “health chips” seems right. But, to have the world’s lone superpower mandate a device to be IMPLANTED is not just scary. It is prophetic!

Is this in its current form the mark of the beast? No it is not. The Bible is clear that this will not become the mark of the beast until midway through tribulation when it is somehow associated with a sign of allegiance to the antichrist and it is in someway imprinted with a number or symbols associated 666.

However this is the very mechanism by which it will happen and obviously since the mark will be on a global scale, this has not fully played out. Keep in mind though, we are already staring down the barrel of a global government who will implement this on a global scale. Also, the rapture is a game changing event. If the global government hasn’t come to fruition at the point of the rapture, it will overnight when the rapture happens and this law will be applied across the board. 

I wouldn’t be surprised if same healthcare ruse won’t be applied under the premises that the mass disappearance of people is a global healthcare emergency and the application of this law [globally and under a global government] will prevent others from disappearing or at a minimum be a means of determining what happened via the tracking capability inherent to RFID chips.

Now I’m going to ask you the question that I asked earlier: 

Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? By virtue of the fact that this hasn’t sent tremors through the Christian community, one can only assume that community is asleep at the wheel. Maybe everyone is so bogged down in all the other evil facets to this new law that this has slipped through the cracks. I tend to doubt that is the case though. 

I think the reason that hardly no one has seemed to even so much as mentioned this is because human nature is kicking in and it’s hard to get past the logical mind when it is telling you that this just can’t be or this is somehow a misrepresentation of the new law and all those who had a part in it. Mixed in with that, no one wants to risk their reputation or for some their ministries reputation by saying something that could get them labeled as conspiracy nut.

Captain Edward Smith, captain of the titanic said this statement shortly before the titanic embarked on its maiden voyage:

“I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder. I cannot conceive of any vital disaster happening to this vessel. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.”

The point here is that people to tend see and believe what they want to see and believe and in this case, what’s easiest to not see and not believe.
See above webcast for video.
All that you have seen so far is a matter of fact and easily investigated by yourself. So I say again, is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy?

Romans 13:11

And do this, understanding the present time. The hour has come.

http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html

June 25^th, 1962, the black day for America.                                                                   

 The day when Chief Justice Earl Warren decided with 5 other judges that praying in American schools is unconstitutional and a violation of the Establishment Clause. This was the prayer deemed unconstitutional by the court:

 “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen.”

The case “ Engel v. Vitale” was  just the beginning of the end. It was followed by “Lee v. Weisman” in 1992 in which clergy-led prayers at high school graduation ceremonies were prohibited. In another case, “Santa Fe ISD v. Doe”, the Court furthered its decision by banning student-led prayer at high school football games. What is next? To prohibit the moment of prayer on the day of inauguration? To completely abolish the day of prayer? To stop praying before sessions of Congress?

Today is 50^th anniversary of this monstrosity. All the people under 50 don’t even know that praying was officially legal in schools. What they do know is that it is illegal to bring one aspirin for headaches in school but it is ok for schools to consult and assist underage pregnancy; it is illegal to talk about God yet saying they are a Satanist is a practice of their first Amendment. It is illegal to teach that God created the world in 7 days, yet every kid needs to learn one year or another that the Big Band Theory could’ve happened.

50 years is enough for darkness.

It’s time to wake up and stand for the truth, to stand for God! Look where society is now. Do we think we have another 50 years to do something? No! We need to act now or it will be too late. If we don’t teach our children to depend in God then they will be taught how to depend on drugs; if we don’t teach them how to pray for their parents they will continue to ignore them; if they don’t pray for their teachers, they will continue to shoot them; if they don’t pray for our country we will lose our freedom one day.

50 year is enough.

I don’t know what you will do “But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.”

“The human problem is that smart people are full of doubt and stupid people are full of confidence.”

by Charles Bukovski

Un titlu excelent pe blogul lui Emanuel Contac: http://vaisamar.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/gabriel-liiceanu-despre-drama-omului-drogat-de-putere/ preluand un articol scris de Gabriel Liiceanu: http://www.contributors.ro/cultura/cateva-amintiri-din-%E2%80%9Eepoca-nastase%E2%80%9D/ .

Fragment din articol:

Citind acest articol, mai ales expresiile subliniate de mai sus si puse intr-o singura fraza, am ramas surprins de asemanarea dramatica dintre viata politica si viata bisericii (adunarii) din ziua de astazi. Cati credinciosi nu au recunoscut in aceasta descriere multi pastori actuali…. care conduc despotic de zeci de ani?….si care nu au curajul raspunderii?….si care se cred pe deasupra oamenilor de rand?….si care fac abuzuri fara nici o remuscare?…..si care, atunci cand sunt dati pe fata, se agata de scaun cu amandoua miinile?

Ma gandeam de multe ori si nu gaseam nici o explicatie acestei comportari. Astazi, citind acest titlu, am gasit ca o revelatie raspunsul: DRAMA OMULUI DROGAT DE… PUTERE!!!!! Spun revelatie pentru ca drama nu este a noastra, a celor nedreptatiti, acelor striviti fara mila de nepasarea lor, ci este a lor, acelor bolnavi de putere, acelor drogati de putere, acelor care se uita la tine de sus cu superioritate  sau care nici nu te vad ca existi, privind dincolo de tine ca prin sticla.

Cu omul drogat nici nu poti sa te pui, nici nu poti sa-l ajuti daca nu se vrea ajutat. Omul drogat traieste intr-o alta dimensiune, de multe ori paralela cu realitatea. Omului drogat nu poti sa-i vorbesti nici frumos pentru ca nu intelege, si nici urat pentru ca nu-i pasa. Omul drogat isi creeaza imaginea proprie despre viata si apoi se autocoordoneaza dupa aceste imagini.

Terapia omului drogat este de obicei lunga, anevoioasa si costisitoare. Clinicile de reabilitare sunt pline si de cele mai multe ori da rezultate. Insa pentru omul drogat de putere nu cred ca exista remediu. Istoria ne prezinta doar un caz de reusita: Nebucadnetar. Prea putin spre a spera! Omul drogat de putere este fara recuperare, motiv pentru care acum vad ca intr-adevar el traieste o DRAMA ADEVARATA; este drama omului drogat de….putere.

M-as fi bucurat sa pot sa inchei cu expresia “orice asemanare cu realitatea este intamplatoare”, dar nu pot. Realitatea este aici, prezenta si o atingem cu mana in fiecare clipa….

What Happens When You Let Gay Philly Activists Into the White House 

They pose for pics giving Ronald Reagan’s portait the finger.

by Victor Fiorillo   6/22/2012

Last Friday, an attaché of important gay people from Philadelphia made a trip to Washington D.C. as invited guests of President Barack Obama for the White House’s first-ever gay pride reception. There, they danced to the sounds of a Marine Corps band; they dined on crab cakes and canapés; they hand-delivered letters from concerned citizens like this 18-year old who has had four people close to him gunned down, and noted rhyming raconteur CA Conrad; and some of them took advantage of photo opportunities to give the late President Ronald Reagan the middle finger.

“It’s not a gesture that I would use in the White House when representing our city and our community,” opines Philadelphia Gay News publisher Mark Segal (center), who opted for a sarcastic thumbs-up pose in front of the portrait of George W. Bush over the more vulgar one demonstrated by his Reagan-loathing peers, Matthew “Matty” Hart (left), and self-taught photographer turned toast-of-the-town Zoe Strauss (right).

“I have friends who work in that building,” Segal explains. “I’m not going to do something that could embarrass them or that could somehow damage a campaign that is so important. ‘Be on your best behavior,’ my staff told me.’ I think they know me too well.”

This wasn’t Segal’s first trip to the White House, having twice visited during Bill Clinton’s gay-friendly tenure. “One of the things on my bucket list was to dance with my boyfriend at the White House,” remarks Segal.”And this is the second time I got to do it. We come up to the main foyer, and what do they play? Barbra Streisand. ‘The Way We Were.’ And I thought, Are they going to play nothing but Barbra, Bette and Lady Gaga? I was waiting for ‘Over the Rainbow.’ I mean, this is the Marine band!” Clearly, Segal, a dedicated activist but also an astute political hobnobber, wants to be invited back.

But his counterparts couldn’t seem to care less. Hart posted his photo on Facebook with the caption, “Fuck Reagan.” Strauss simply posted hers without commentary. After all, the murderous facial expression and double-barreled bird-flipping seem to speak for themselves. Comments ranged from “you forgot to add with a chainsaw” on Hart’s “Fuck Reagan” note, to my personal favorite, “star wars … up yours,” on Strauss’s.

Strauss, who is also seen here, kissing her partner beneath the Reagan portrait, declined to comment for this story (“I’m keeping out of the press!” she texted me), but made crystal clear her position on Reagan by posting on Facebook a long list of things that happened under his watch, including the Supreme Court’s Bowers v. Hardwick decision, upholding the constitutionality of Georgia’s anti-sodomy law, the Iran-Contra affair and the invasion of Grenada.

Additionally, Strauss posted Reagan’s memorable statement on LGBT rights from the 1980 campaign trail: “My criticism is that [the gay movement] isn’t just asking for civil rights; it’s asking for recognition and acceptance of an alternative lifestyle which I do not believe society can condone, nor can I.”

“Yeah, fuck Reagan,” reiterates Hart one week after the reception. “Ronald Reagan has blood on his hands. The man was in the White House as AIDS exploded, and he was happy to see plenty of gay men and queer people die. He was a murderous fool, and I have no problem saying so. Don’t invite me back. I don’t care.”

Switching gears, Hart describes the reception as “fantastic” and notes that the White House staff seemed “giddy.” ”A lot of work had to happen to make this reception politically viable and possible,” he observes. “There were many service members there. I met a woman with lots of medals, an important military person, who was with her partner. And all her life, she had to be in the closet—until now. And I met a couple from Tennessee in their mid-50s, two men who have been in a relationship for 22 years and run an LGBT youth program. They could barely speak with their emotions. They kept saying, All through grade school and high school, people were telling us we’re gonna burn in hell. And here we are honored guests of Obama.”

Referring to the reception and not to his photo op, Hart adds, “It was just a gesture, but a very powerful one.” Speaking of powerful gestures, Hart shot portions of the video below, which features, among other things, Segal dancing to the Marine Corps band and a wedding proposal between a female-to-male transgendered person (killer suit!) and a biological woman.

“And so is it correct to refer to this as a transgendered wedding proposal?” I asked Hart this morning, via Facebook chat, naturally. “2012 is so confusing!” His reply: “I think this is the proposal of our time. It is not so easy to categorize. Liberating.”

UPDATE 6/22 9:30 p.m.: According to Fox News, the White House has issued a statement rebuking some of the behavior described in this article: “While the White House does not control the conduct of guests at receptions, we certainly expect that all attendees conduct themselves in a respectful manner. Most all do. These individuals clearly did not. Behavior like this doesn’t belong anywhere, least of all in the White House.”

 http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2012/06/22/gay-activists-give-ronald-reagan-finger-white-house/  

A story is told about a soldier who was finally coming home after having fought in the war in Iraq. He called his parents from San Franciso.

“Mom and Dad, I’m coming home, but I’ve a favor to ask. I have a friend I’d like to bring home with me.”

“Sure” they replied, “we’d love to meet him.”

“There’s something you should know” the son continued, “he was hurt pretty badly in the fighting. He stepped on a land mine and lost an arm and a leg. He has nowhere else to go, and I want him to come live with us.”

“I’m sorry to hear that, son. Maybe we can help him find somewhere to live.”

“No, Mom and Dad, I want him to live with us.”

“Son” said the father, “you don’t know what you’re asking. Someone with such a handicap would be a terrible burden on us. We have our own lives to live, and we can’t let something like this interfere with our lives. I think you should just come home and forget about this guy. He’ll find a way to live his own.”

At that point, the son hung up the phone. The parents heard nothing more from him. A few a days later, however, they received a call from the San Francisco police.

Their son had died after falling from a building, they were told. The police believed it was suicide.
The grief-stricken parents flew to San Francisco and were taken to the city morgue to identify the body of their son.

They recognized him, but to their horror they also discovered something they didn’t know.

Their son had only one hand and one leg.

One day, you’ll be just a MEMORY for some people.

Do your BEST to be a good one!!!!!

HAPPY FATHER’S DAY !!!!!!!

Cuvintele din titlul postării sunt rostite, de obicei, cu un fel de nemulțumire pretins înțeleaptă, cu o clătinare dojenitoare din cap, cu un aer de justificată frustrare. Ca să vezi, domnule, cum „tinerii din ziua de azi…” nu mai citesc, nu mai respectă, nu mai fac, nu mai dreg.

Ca și când „tinerii din ziua de azi” s-ar fi născut într-un vid socio-familial și și-ar fi făcut singuri educația. Ca și când nimeni dintre înțelepții care stau pe margine și trag concluzii sceptice nu ar avea niciun amestec în procesul educativ al tinerelor generații.

Rostite în barbă, cu sprânceana încruntată, cuvintele acestea vin să sancționeze o generație întreagă, să îi consfințească inferioritatea față de cei „de altădată”…

Sunt surprins cumva să aud asemenea cuvinte de la bunici și părinți. De la oamenii care au avut (și încă mai au) putere decizională în multe situații care-i privesc direct pe „tinerii din ziua de azi”.

O logică elementară ne obligă să constatăm că „tinerii din ziua de azi” sunt produsul lumii pe care au configurat-o – cu voia sau cu pasivitatea lor – tocmai cârcotașii de acum. „Tinerii din ziua de azi” nu sunt veniți din sfere extraterestre, ci s-au născut tot p-aici pe undeva, prin maternitățile patriei noastre. Și au crescut în creșele, grădinițele, școlile generale și liceele românești.

Nu poți stigmatiza generația tânără fără să incriminezi implicit și inevitabil generațiile care au pregătit terenul pentru apariția ei. Atâta vreme cât nu au fost fabricați în laborator, ci fac parte din niște familii, copiii nu sunt abstracțiuni independente, ci au dobândit anumite deprinderi de la predecesorii lor.

Nu împărtășesc însă scepticismul în ce privește tânăra generație. Fiindcă, din câte (mai) văd eu, acești copii și tineri „se strică” privind la generațiile anterioare. În sufletul lor există încă destulă ingenuitate, suficient idealism și simț al dreptății. Mulți dintre ei sunt dispuși să discute cu sufletul pe masă, autentic, fără măști și fără ifose. Sunt interesați să afle, nu să se îmbogățească, caută oameni vii cu care să interacționeze.

„Tinerii din ziua de azi” văd însă zilnic cum prostul fudul și avut e mai tare decât oricine în țara asta. Văd că tata și mama mizează pe șpăgi, relații, cunoștințe ori de câte ori e nevoie. Or asta nu e de natură să încurajeze rectitudinea morală a tânărului, nici respectul pentru generațiile care fac din orice întâmplare de viață un prilej de corupție și compromis.

„Tinerii din ziua de azi” sunt mutilați zilnic de profesori hapsâni și slabi pregătiți. Sunt expuși sistematic de societate unor modele tâmpite și degenerate. Iar părinții, în loc să descurajeze aceste manifestări, stau și fac rating la orice emisiune idioată.

„Tinerii din ziua de azi” au încă scânteia care a murit în multe suflete ale părinților sau bunicilor (ori a fost estompată de blazare și trecerea timpului), însă ea este extrem de fragilă și foarte rar îngrijită să se dezvolte și să se transforme într-un foc sadea.

„Tinerii din ziua de azi” sunt oameni care încă mai caută, care vor și cer, care însetează, dar cărora societatea părinților și bunicilor lor le oferă lături morale, deșeuri existențiale. De ce ne-am mira că se dezvoltă monstruos când sunt hrăniți cu resturi și otrăvuri?

Până și în biserică se ridică mustrător sprânceana, deși adesea reprezentanții bisericii nu sunt în stare să articuleze un răspuns consistent la întrebările și problemele tinerilor. Nu degeaba există personaje devenite „vedete” între tineri. E semn (și) că, în general, nu prea primesc ceea ce au nevoie.

„Tinerii din ziua de azi” au cusurul de a fi deosebit de atenți și receptivi la ceea ce se cere de la ei. Nu la ceea ce, cu glas mohorât, bodogănesc generațiile mai în vârstă, ci la semnalele implicite, la cerințele nerostite, dar atotprezente în toate manifestările corpului social. Și atunci, în virtutea adaptabilității lor deosebite, se apucă să facă exact ceea ce le garantează succesul social, notorietatea, viața ușoară. Firește că au defectele lor, da nu cred că sunt mai mari sau mai grave decât ale altor generații.

De ce i-am condamna, de vreme ce aceste apucături sunt înscrise în firea noastră umană, însă ei au mobilitatea necesară să se miște mai rapid și fără inhibiții în direcția necesară? Suspectez că „tinerii din ziua de azi” sunt o oglindă fidelă a idealurilor pe care le-a fixat societatea (făurită de părinți și bunici, să fie clar) și pe care ei și le însușesc mai bine, grație inerției mult mai mici și a moralității mult mai precare pe care au adoptat-o la îndemnul aceleiași societăți.

http://drezina.wordpress.com/2012/06/13/tinerii-din-ziua-de-azi/#more-2894

Mulţi pastori şi lucrători din cadrul bisericilor de astăzi uită că ei sunt oameni, mai presus de funcţia sau slujba pe care o au, au primit-o, sau le-a fost încredinţată. 

Pe lângă acest simplu aspect, ei se consideră a fi singurii în măsură să dea la alţii “sfaturi sfinte“, fără să ştie nimeni de fapt care este viaţa lor particulară, luxul în care trăiesc, sau că în afara bisericii ei nu sunt mai mult decât nişte… oameni ca toţi ceilalţi. Dar asta am mai spus o dată, deci devin repetativ….

Mulţi pastori trebuie să înveţe în zilele de acum să fie ceea ce cred că sunt, şi să vadă ceea ce sunt şi, călcând peste orgoliul lor personal, trebuie să spună – cel puţin mai des faţă de cât o fac acum – “îmi pare rău”. 

Trăim printre oameni care au mentalităţi şi caractere diferite; care dintre noi nu a trebuit să spună vreodată cuiva “iartă-mă, te rog“, pentru un motiv sau altul? Uneori ne este greu să facem acest pas, dar acest lucru clădeşte de fapt respectul. Cei care cred că poziţia de pastor le dă şi autoritate nu fac altceva decât să preia o atitudine nebiblică; atunci când nu admitem că am greşit ne poziţionăm mai sus decât ceilalţi din jurul nostru – aceasta înseamnă lipsa de respect.

Iată mai jos câteva caracteristici de bază ale unui pastor, conducător care dovedeşte respect faţă de semenii lui:

Matei 20:25-26 – are atitudine de servitor


Tit 3:2 – nu insultă pe oameni, nu produce certuri, este prietenos, arată blândeţe faţă de toţi oamenii


1 Timotei 3:3 – să nu fie iubitor de bani, să nu bea, să nu fie violent, să fie blând şi paşnic

Probabil că ar fi şi alte pasaje din Biblie care le-am putea menţina aici. Nu există un semn mai mare de conducere imatură în viaţa unui pastor decât atunci când insistă că doar el are dreptate tot timpul. Aţi întâlnit astfel de pastori?

Pastorii sunt puşi la un amvon, pe un pedestal; ei au sarcina să aducă Cuvântul lui Dumnezeu, fie că vrem sau nu acest lucru; unii sunt chiar intimidaţi de acest aspect. Când un pastor recunoaşte că trebuia să facă lucrurile altfel, să asculte la preocupările altora din jur, atunci el îi invită pe cei din biserică într-un proces de creştere şi luptă spirituală. Da, ei sunt pastori, dar în acelaşi timp ei sunt şi umani. Ei sunt într-un proces continuu de învăţare şi creştere. Pot să facă acest pas. 

Nici o relaţie nu poate fi clădită fără să treacă prin ciclul pocăinţei şi al iertării. Este esenţial pentru noi – în calitate de păcătoşi, fie că suntem pastori sau nu – să iertăm şi să cerem iertare. Prin a cere iertare acelora faţă de care am greşit nu facem altceva decât să modelăm comunitatea autentică, biblică –producem relaţii biblice. Arătăm soţiei cum să ceară scuze soţului ei; arătăm taţilor cum să ceară iertare fiicelor lor; arătăm şefilor cum să ceară iertare angajaţilor lor. Dacă pastorii sunt destul de maturi încât să admită că au greşit, atunci aceasta îi va autoriza pe alţii să trăiască cu o autenticitate similară. 

Este adevărat că uneori un pastor trebuie să stea ferm împotriva cuiva din biserica sa. Da, sunt şi oameni care fac numai tulburare şi necaz în biserică (mă refer în general, nu doar la o anumită denominaţie aici). Mă întreb câte conflicte şi dezbinări bisericeşti ar putea fi evitate dacă cineva din conducere ar fi demonstrat, pur şi simplu, maturitatea biblică, şi ar fi admis greşeala proprie. Atunci când un pastor îşi cere iertare şi vede ceea ce trebuia să fi făcut, el nu face altceva decât să difuze un conflict, şi să paveze calea pentru împăcare. Uneori există lucruri ce nu pot fi rezolvate; am avut cu toţi ocazia să fim pe lângă oameni obraznici care nu pot fi domoliţi şi a căror prezenţă produce răni bisericii. Cu toate acestea, de cele mai multe ori există o problemă cu privire la maturitatea spirituală. Pastorii care duc la o astfel de maturitate nu fac altceva decât să dezarmeze potenţialii adversari. 

Unii pastori cred că dacă deţin funcţia de pastor ei au tot timpul dreptate; sau că ar fi fost aleşi în acea postură până la Răpire. Uneori ei sunt chiar eronaţi! Un pastor nesigur pe sine se ascunde de fapt în spatele autorităţii sale spirituale cu tot felul de devensive. Un pastor adevărat este cel care are umilinţa să admită atunci când a greşit. Pastorii nu trebuie să fie scandalagii – aceasta duce la divizarea trupului lui Hristos, la modelarea unui tip de conducere lumesc şi, nu în ultimul rând, la rănirea turmei la care ei sunt chemaţi să slujească.

În concluzie, nu putem spune că cele de mai sus ar fi un “preş magic” către conducerea perfectă. Uneori pastorii trebuie să fie duri şi cu obrazul gros ca să poată face alegerile dificile. Există însă o “a treia cale” din a fi un pastor scandalagiu, tiran neapologetic şi un incapabil din “al şaptelea cer”. Aceasta este conducerea slujitoare şi deţine curajul să spună “Îmi pare rău“.

Îi poţi da pastorului tău acest articol să-l citească? Sper să nu te pună să-ţi cer tu iertare lui ulterior… 🙂 

(Foloseşte uneltele de “share” de mai jos pentru a da la alţii acest articol, dacă ţi-a plăcut; aştept opiniile şi părerile tale mai jos) 

Notă: Acest articol este o adaptare după un material scris de Daniel Darling, un pastor tânăr din America, care a realizat că şi el are nevoie să spună mai des “Îmi pare rău”. Detalii aici. 

http://crestinismtrait.blogspot.com/2012/06/pastorii-trebuie-sa-spuna-mai-des-imi.html